ROUGH JUSTICE
The original Rough Justice programmes
were produced in the BBC’s Current Affairs Department by Peter Hill. He began
work on the concept in 1979 and began production in 1980.
He introduced two new forms
of work into this area of research. First, having already produced
investigative programmes on other subjects for the previous ten years, he
introduced a set of formal investigative procedures, bringing into the re-investigations
the latest forensic scientific techniques as well as new means of obtaining
important documents.
However, perhaps his biggest
revolution was to make three programmes in a series all at the same time. This,
though risky, proved very cost-effective. It allowed more money to be spent on
research.
Hill also worked in close
cooperation with the BBC lawyers – and also introduced the idea of having a
senior legal figure ( usually a former appeal court judge) to supervise the
work being undertaken. He also worked very closely with Tom Sargant of “Justice”
Hill also insisted that
Rough Justice should always follow up cases - with petitions to the Home Office
etc. Once a case became a Rough Justice case, it remained in the programme
until it had gone through the Court of Appeal.
Hill’s “Rough Justice”,
some dozen programmes in all, went through three separate series, from 1981 to
1985. After this Hill left the programme when the battle between
The BBC took the programme out
of Current Affairs and placed it in the more “documentary style” department,
Features Group. Although subsequent programmes carried on the Rough Justice
work, they did not have the strict discipline of the original series. This was
no reflection on the team which took over the work. It was simply because such was
not necessary by then. The original series had broken down many of the
barriers, and after the public reactions against
The Current Affairs series of Rough Justice covered the cases of
Jock Russell, Michael McDonagh, John Walters, Margaret Livesey, Ernie Clarke,
George Beattie, Alf Fox, Anthony Steel and Anthony Mycock. The presenter of these programmes was Martin
Young.
Programmes in the Current
Affairs period of Rough Justice won several awards, including an “Outstanding Journalism”
award from the Royal Television Society to Peter Hill for his work on the
series.
After Peter Hill left the
programme, he continued working on such cases because of the Rough Justice
pledge to do so. One such was that of Anthony Steel. It was a typical Rough Justice
product. This had been the second programme of the third series of "Rough
Justice". It was transmitted by the BBC in October 1985.
Hill brought this case to
finality in 2003 when Steel’s conviction was quashed in the Court of Appeal
It proved to be the biggest
case he ever worked on – though it is currently being rivaled by the case of
George Beattie which Hill has got back into the Scottish Court of Appeal,
unsuccessfully, twice already.
In the case of Anthony
Steel, exhaustive investigations were done by Peter Hill and his tiny team. Literally, every
producer of such fish key rings in the world was contacted. Every retailer in Bradford
was visited - as were all the distributors in
It became clear during the
early stages of the investigation that the police in
The "Rough Justice
" team suffered more harassment from the police on this case than on any
other case. On one occasion the team was tipped off that their next interview
had been infiltrated by the police - an officer was posing as a relative of the
next interviewee.
Christine Aldred - who identified
the "Carol key ring" for "Rough
Justice" was threatened by a well-known "copper's nark" that she
would find his foot in her throat if she talked to the BBC.
This kind of action
culminated in a meeting Peter Hill had with a senior officer in Bradford -
where the officer claimed that the police thought the camera crew and research
team were students from
The most difficult person
to approach was the mother-in-law Vera Smith. She refused all overtures and
objected when her photograph was taken, perfectly legally, in a public place.
Having started the campaign against Steel, she wished to avoid any personal
responsibility for her actions.
One of the more intriguing
aspects of the "Rough Justice" research was the hypnosis session
conducted on the man who saw the Austin Cambridge car near the scene of crime
at about the time of the murder. Comparing his original statement with the
hypnosis recollection, the most striking aspect is the description of the back
of the car, which convinced everyone on the team that the car was an Austin
Cambridge and not a Morris Oxford, which is very similar.
The most difficult
technical aspect of the programme was covering the confession. Reading it alone
would have taken many minutes - and would have been boring. Further, the best
way to look at the confession would be in situ - to see how Steel's version
matched the reality of the terrain. Martin Young and Peter Hill, who scripted
the programme, asked Paul Wilkinson - Steel's friend and no relation to Carol -
to re-trace the route mentioned by Steel, and read out key moments of the
confession at the relevant locations.
The most amusing visual -
and perhaps the most telling - moment in the programme was when Martin Young
released a large balloon on a string whilst standing at the back door of
Steel's house. The camera was placed in the position Carol had been in when
Steel had claimed to have seen her. The balloon was above the roof of the house
before the camera saw it! It demonstrated that Steel could not possibly have
seen Carol as he had described it in his confession.
"The case of the
Tell-tale Fish" as this programme was called, was the penultimate
programme by Martin Young and Peter Hill. Lord Lane was
already enraged by their earlier work and determined to put them out of
business.